David Hockney: Splashing Perspectives

A large David Hockney retrospective recently opened at Tate Britain. This is not a review of an exhibition I won’t be able to see in person, instead let’s focus on Hockney’s “perspectives”. These should make YOU want to go check out his work, in London before May 29, 2017 or elsewhere.

beverly-hills-housewifebetty-freeman-1966-7-9millionusd
Beverly Hills Housewife, 1966 David Hockney Inc © David Hockney acrylic on 2 canvas, 72×144 in.

 

A quick word on depth and perspective. Artists had not figured it out before the Renaissance so they resorted to stacking figures of pretty much equal size in what’s called medieval overlap. Everything looks quite flat and rigid.

With the Renaissance came Brunelleschi and Da Vinci. They worked out linear perspective and vanishing point.

img_9125

Have a look at the picture above: even though you know the pier is made of two sets of poles which remain at the same distance from one another, as it recedes in the distance it looks like they shrink and converge into one point, the vanishing point on the horizon line. It’s called monocular perspective. But David Hockney calls it “cyclopic perspective”. Why is that?

In his art, David Hockney wants you and him to be “looking with both eyes”. So let’s dive from multiple vantage points.

sunonthepool
Sun On The Pool Los Angeles April 13th 1982, David Hockney Inc © David Hockney. composite polaroid, 34 3/4 x 36 1/4 in.

In the 1980’s, Hockney used Polaroid pictures to make collages. He addressed his subject matter from multiple one-point perspective angles to make it whole again…and definitely seen with at least two eyes in perfect working order!

What I had not previously pieced together was the social and personal context in which these collages emerged. A beautiful essay by Laurence Weschler (Love Life, David Hockney’s Timescapes) underlined what dominated our news in 1982: AIDS.

Or rather, GRID (Gay Related Immune Deficiency) as it was referred to for some time until it was shown that everybody, not just gay people, could contract AIDS.

noyaandbillbrandt1
Noya and Bill Brandt with Self-Portrait (although they were watching this picture being made), Pembroke Studios, London 8th May 1982, David Hockney Inc © David Hockney Composite Polaroid

The 1980’s was a time when Hockney lost friends. His fear of death visually associated with “this constrictive, tapering, ever-narrowing stranglehold of one-point perspective[1]” shows in his artworks. He rejects GRID with his version of a grid made out of snapshots encompassing life seen through many angles as seen above.

merced-river-1982
Merced River,Yosemite Valley, Sept. 1982 David Hockney Inc © David Hockney. photographic collage, 52×61 in.

With borderless Pentax collages, he opens up the grid to capture movement and life. Even though Hockney said “photography is all right if you don’t mind looking at the world from the point of view of a paralyzed Cyclops, for a split second”, a multitude of static images convey the shifting reality he is trying to catch, the water flowing long after the shutter release.

In his quest to make visible what one eye cannot see alone, he observed a similar shift happened in Old Masters portraits: they seemed to have become much more alive and realistic around 1430.

img_1524

Convincingly demonstrated in his book Secret Knowledge, Hockney’s controversial thesis is that Old Masters such as Van Eyck used concave mirrors and lenses to trace on canvas the full tonal reality of objects placed in front of them. Hockney was accused of saying Old Masters cheated. I think he only says they masterly incorporated newly available optic tools and explored their tentative version of increased realism to add life to their paintings.

Objects both near and distant were painted in equally vivid details, neglecting the blurring effect of depth to invite the viewer to take a better and closer look.

David Hockney did the same except his aim was never to be realistic. He took his photo collages one step further to deliver monumental vistas made of sometimes 60 canvas, like A Bigger Grand Canyon (1998) and A Closer Grand Canyon (1998).

grandcan700
“A Bigger Grand Canyon” 1998, David Hockney Inc © David Hockney oil on 60 canvases, 81 x 291 in. overall

In both, you can’t help but being grabbed by the immensity of the landscape, presented to you the viewer with no loss of detail from the vegetation in the foreground, to the rock formation in the middle or the far side of the canyon rim. Using multiple viewpoint perspective gets you to see it in an all-encompassing visual immersion.

 

hockney-pearblossom-highway
Pearblossom Hwy., 11 – 18th April 1986, #2, David Hockney Inc © David Hockney

My favorite is Pearl Blossom Highway. The multiple vantage perspectives are what makes the canvas reverberate the colors and heat haze of this California desert scene.

It will be part of a Hockney exhibition at the Getty Museum from June 27 till October 15, 2107 where many of his photo collages will be on show.

 

Please use the comment box to share your thoughts on the exhibition if you’re in London. I’d love to hear about it from you.

Use the box as well if you’d like to plan a day trip to the Getty Museum at the end of June:-)

Or just press Like to let me know you want to read more of these.

© 2017 Ingrid Westlake

 

 

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


 

 

 

[1] I am indebted to Laurence Weschler’s essay (Love Life, David Hockney’s Timescapes) for this post.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “David Hockney: Splashing Perspectives

  1. Technical and interesting subjet of this artist…I like your photo of a pier with round white clouds above( you are the specialist of clouds! )
    and I like the californian desert with Joshua Trees , an enfantin painting!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I am embarrassed that I knew so little about David Hockney, thanks for all the information. This is the first time I have seen Pearblossom Hiway-it is amazing especially for those of us who love the desert. I would be interested in trip to the Getty. I too love your pier photo.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I will report on Hockney’s Tate exhibition when I come back from London in April. Now Ingrid you should also write on displacement in the work of our beloved Mona Hatoum … and Hockney’s book on old master’s use of optical devices is titled Secret Knowledge, while Secret History is an amazing book by Donna Tartt that deserves another post … 😉

    Liked by 1 person

    1. OMG! I have the book in front of me, took a picture of it but you’re right, Donna Tartt must be on my mind 😂 or it’s a subliminal message about referencing! Thank you for spotting it, Lorenza. Now, you can only imagine how long my list of projects is and of course, amazing Mona Hatoum is on it! Can’t wait to hear what you thought of the Hockney retrospective.

      Like

  4. Seen this on the community pool. This is a great piece, don’t usually read stuff like this because I’m a little uncultured when it comes to art but felt as though I understood what you were talking about. Now following and keen to learn more!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you so much Ethan! I am so glad you liked it! That’s exactly my intent in writing about art as it should not be complicated to the point of alienating people. My only objective is to help people look a bit longer and get so much more out of art as a result. Thank you for following!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s